at first i want to congratulate you, for your software. It is the best software I have seen for the functionalities offered. We are evaluating it's use in our organization.
Below you can find some issues detected using the Test Session functionalities:
When we try to run a test case from the “test case runs” section of a Test Session, selecting one of the shown icons (edit, pass, fail or block), we have some issues:
1. sometimes appears this message “Some field contains invalid data. Please correct first”.
2. sometimes the Pop-up (named Test case run) doesn’t appear and the status directly changes in blocked or passed without asking for a comment.
3. sometimes the test case name is automatically replaced with another existing test name. We can check this error reading the “Change history” section where there are two different test case names for “value before” and “value after”.
Moreover some questions about test case runs.
1. In the section “Change history”, the id displayed for the test case added is different from the original. Is it correct? If so it can give rise to confusion.
2. The Manual of Project’or RIA about Test sessions explains that test cases are “linked” to test session. This term is ambigous because could lead to use the "Linked Element" section. Is better to use the term "added" instead of "linked" ?
1. sometimes appears this message “Some field contains invalid data. Please correct first”.
It means some data is not correct. Incorrect fields are highlighted. For instance, when status is set to failed, a ticket must be selected (or created).
2. sometimes the Pop-up (named Test case run) doesn’t appear and the status directly changes in blocked or passed without asking for a comment.
It is normal for status : OK and Blocked. By default only Error status requires a description.
But it is amways possible to add a comment afterwards, using the edit button.
3. sometimes the test case name is automatically replaced with another existing test name. We can check this error reading the “Change history” section where there are two different test case names for “value before” and “value after”.
I never faced this issue. Could you descibe use case to reproduce this issue ?
1. In the section “Change history”, the id displayed for the test case added is different from the original. Is it correct? If so it can give rise to confusion.
id displayed is the id of the link, not the id of the test case.
Ticket #1094 recorded
2. The Manual of Project’or RIA about Test sessions explains that test cases are “linked” to test session. This term is ambigous because could lead to use the "Linked Element" section. Is better to use the term "added" instead of "linked" ?
En poursuivant votre navigation, vous acceptez le dépôt de cookies tiers destinés au bon fonctionnement et à la sécurisation du site (gestion de session, reCaptcha) et à une analyse statistique anonymisée des accès sur notre site (Google Analytics). Si vous vous inscrivez, les informations que vous fournirez ne seront jamais divulguées à un tiers sous quelque forme que ce soit. En savoir plus
Cookies settings
×
Functional Cookies
Ce site utilise des cookies pour assurer son bon fonctionnement et ne peuvent pas être désactivés de nos systèmes. Nous ne les utilisons pas à des fins publicitaires. Si ces cookies sont bloqués, certaines parties du site ne pourront pas fonctionner.
Session
Please login to see yours activities!
Other cookies
Ce site web utilise un certain nombre de cookies pour gérer, par exemple, les sessions utilisateurs.
Support us on Capterra
